Send via SMS

Wednesday, January 18, 2006

New York Times comments on "Design vs. Darwinism"


Today the New York Times is publishing a piece in its Science section commenting on the recent article published in L'Osservatore Romano (already reported on here and commented on here). This article should prove to be a controversial addition to the debate as it already stands.

In 'Design' vs. Darwinism, Darwin Wins Point in Rome

by Ian Fisher and Cornelia Dean

ROME, Jan. 18 - The official Vatican newspaper published an article this week labeling as "correct" the recent decision by a judge in Pennsylvania that intelligent design should not be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution.

"If the model proposed by Darwin is not considered sufficient, one should search for another," Fiorenzo Facchini, a professor of evolutionary biology at the University of Bologna, wrote in the Jan. 16-17 edition of the paper, L'Osservatore Romano.

"But it is not correct from a methodological point of view to stray from the field of science while pretending to do science," he wrote, calling intelligent design unscientific. "It only creates confusion between the scientific plane and those that are philosophical or religious."

The article was not presented as an official church position. But in the subtle and purposely ambiguous world of the Vatican, the comments seemed notable, given their strength on a delicate question much debated under the new pope, Benedict XVI.

Advocates for teaching evolution hailed the article. "He is emphasizing that there is no need to see a contradiction between Catholic teachings and evolution," said Dr. Francisco J. Ayala, professor of biology at the University of California, Irvine, and a former Dominican priest. "Good for him."

But Robert L. Crowther, spokesman for the Center for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute, a Seattle organization where researchers study and advocate intelligent design, dismissed the article and other recent statements from leading Catholics defending evolution. Drawing attention to them was little more than trying "to put words in the Vatican's mouth," he said.

L'Osservatore is the official newspaper of the Vatican and basically represents the Vatican's views. Not all its articles represent official church policy. At the same time, it would not be expected to present an article that dissented deeply from that policy.


Read the rest of the article here, which next goes on to include the NYT's intepretation of and commentary on Cardinal Schonborn's contributions to this debate.

Reference is made in the article to Cardinal Schonborn's original op-ed piece for the NYT, as well as to his clarifying remarks made in his First Catechetical Lecture on Creation and Evolution.

In addition, Ian Fisher has published a slightly-modified version of this article in the International Herald Tribune entitled "Vatican gives a nod to evolution."

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home